
We have a referendum coming up on Thursday on whether or not to have an elected mayor for Nottingham. Now, I must admit I haven't really followed the history of how this came about, so I have missed all the background. On the face of it, it sounded a good idea to have a mayor elected by the people rather than one by just the councillors. However, the local Labour party seems to be running a campaign for sticking with what we have got. The problem is that the leaflets they put out are full of a lot of sensationalist headlines and without any reasoned arguments.
A lot of their concentration for example is that having an elected mayor will cost £1m, but it doesn't say how much it costs to have a leader elected by the councillors and why it would cost more to have the mayor elected. It also doesn't say anything about what extra powers a mayor might have compared with the leader elected by the councillors. And they make a big play of the fact that the mayor might be of a different party to the majority of the elected councillors, but if that's what people vote for then that is what they want.
I am still twiddling my thumbs over this so would appreciate any comments from people who have looked at the pros and cons of this in more detail.